PENGARUH KEPEMILIKAN MANAJERIAL DAN KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG PADA PERUSAHAAN SUB SEKTOR HOTEL, RESTORAN, DAN PARIWISATA YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI) PERIODE 2014-2017

Authors

  • Tyara Dwi Putri Universitas Bung Hatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37301/jmubh.v14i2.14814

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of managerial ownership, institutional ownership and debt policy on the company in Sub Sector Hotel, Restaurant, and Pariwisata listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange Period 2014-2017. The hypothesis testing was conducted using Multiple Linear Regressian. The study found that there is negative and significant relationship between managerial ownership, institutional ownership and debt policy.

References

Agrawal, Anup., Gershon N.Mandelker., 1990. Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments. Journal of Financial adn Quantitative Analysis, Vol 25, N0.2

Brigham, Eugene F., Ehrhardt Michael C., 2011. Financial Management : Theory and Practice. South-Westrn Cengage Learning.

Crutchley, C.E., Hansen R.S., 1989. A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management. Hal. 34-46.

Faisal., 2005. Analisis Agency Costs, Struktur Kepemilikan dan Mekanisme Corporate Governance. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi VII. Bali. Desember. p.197-207.

Indahningrum, Rizka Putri dan Handayani, Ratih., 2009. Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Dividen, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Free Cash Flow dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol 11, No 3

Jensen, Michael., Meckling, William., 1976. Theory of the Firm: Manajerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

Jensen, Michael C., 1986. Agency Cost of Free cash Flow,Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76 (2), 323-329.

Jerzemowska, M., 2006. The Main Agency Problems and Their Consequences. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia (3):9-17

Jerzemowska, M., 2006. The Main Agency Problems and Their Consequences. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia (3):9-17

Masdupi, Erni, 2005. Analisis Dampak Struktur Kepemilikan pada Kebijakan Hutang Dalam Mengontrol Konflik Keagenan. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 0, No. 1

Modigliani, Franco., Merton H. Miller., 1963. Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital. The American Economic Review, Vol 53, No 3.

Moh’d., M. A., Perry, Rimbey, 1998., The Impact of Ownership Stucture on Corporate Debt Policy : A Time Series Cross Sectional Analysis, Financial Review, August, Vol. 33, pp. 85-99.

Murni, Sri dan Andriana, 2007. Pengaruh Insider Ownership, Institutional Investor, Dividen Payment, dan Firm Growth terhadap Kebijakan Hutang Perusahaan (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufakturyang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Jakarta Jurnal akuntansi dan Bisnis, Vol.7, No. 1

Myers, Stewart C., 2001. Capital Structure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 2, 81-102

Putri, Tyara Dwi., 2018. Struktur Kepimilikan, Corporate Governance, dan Agency Cost. Jurnal Manajemen Universitas Bung Hatta. Vol, 13, No.2

Rahma, Afiarti. 2014). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Keputusan Pendanaan dan Nilai Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Perode 2009-2012). Jurnal Bisnis Strategi. Vol.23, No.2

Shleifer, A., Vishny R.W., (a) 1986. Large Shareholders and Coporate Control. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 461-488.

Shleifer, Andrei., Vishny, Robert., (b) 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance.The Journal of Finance. June, Vol. 52 No.2.

Warapsari, A.A. Ayu Uccahati dan Suaryana. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manjerial dan Institusional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Utang Sebagai Variabel Intervening. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. Vol.16.3.

Published

2019-07-31