Cyberbullying: Causes of Online Harassment

Authors

  • Norasekin Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Hanitahaiza Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Nurin Afiqah Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Siti Nurbalqis Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Engku Nur Hanisah Nadiah Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Nurazlina Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia
  • Nur Aniah Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management and Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam, Selangor Malaysia

Keywords:

social media, cyberbullying, anonymity, accessibility, peer pressure

Abstract

The use of social media has risen along with cyberbullying as the world gets more digitally linked. Based on a United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) report (2020), Malaysia is ranked as the second highest in Asia for cyberbullying among youth indicating that cyberbullying is becoming an increasingly prominent problem in the country. Research on cyberbullying has made significant progress in recent years, but understanding of cyberbullying behavior remains limited. Therefore, more investigation is needed to develop a comprehensive understanding of factors that influence cyberbullying behavior among adults in Malaysia. The current study aimed to examine the effect of anonymity, accessibility, and peer pressure on cyberbullying behavior among Malaysians. The quantitative research method is utilized by distributing the online questionnaire using Google Forms via face-to-face, email, and social networks. A total of 171 responses were collected and used for the data analysis. The findings show that anonymity, accessibility, and peer pressure have significant effects on cyberbullying behavior. In addition, the study also revealed that accessibility is the most influential factor in cyberbullying behavior. In the digital age, social media plays a central role and it is essential to foster a safe and respectful online environment. Additionally, addressing cyberbullying requires a collective effort from individuals, families, institutions, communities, and policymakers. Enforcing stricter laws and regulations to hold cyberbullies can serve as a deterrent and help to protect potential victims.

References

Alismaiel, O. A. (2023). Digital media used in education: the influence on cyberbullying behaviors among youth students. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(2), 1370.

Aziz, R. A., Racheal Samuel, & K.S. Veera Pandian. (2021). In SPSS Statistics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition ed., pp. 72–73). Malsca Asian Academy.

Bernama (2022, Jan 14). Malaysia is 2nd in Asia for youth cyberbullying. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2022/01/14/malaysia-is-2nd-in-asia-for-youth-cyberbullying.

Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Blaya, C. (Eds.). (2018). International Perspectives on Cyberbullying: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Interventions. Springer International Publishing.

Braumüller B. (2020). Young adults’ perceptions of the relevance of interaction on social online networks for sports activities. European Journal for Sport and Society, 17, 231-249.

Camacho, S., Hassanein, K., Head, M. (2014). Understanding the Factors That Influence the Perceived Severity of Cyber-bullying. HCIB 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8527. Springer, Cham.

Celuch, M., Oksa, R., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2022). Longitudinal effects of cyberbullying at work on well- being and strain: A five-wave survey study. New media & society, 14614448221100782.

Chan, H. C. (Oliver), & Wong, D. S. W. (2019). Traditional School Bullying and Cyberbullying Perpetration: Examining the Psychosocial Characteristics of Hong Kong Male and Female Adolescents. Youth & Society, 51(1), 3–29.

Demsar V., Brace-Govan J., Jack G. & Sands S. (2021) The social phenomenon of trolling: understanding the discourse and social practices of online provocation, Journal of Marketing Management, 37:11-12, 1058-1090.

Deng, L., Sun, W., Xu, D. and Ye, Q. (2021), “Impact of anonymity on consumers' online reviews”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 12, pp. 2259-2270.

Dyussembayeva, S., Viglia, G., Nieto-Garcia, M., & Invernizzi, A. C. (2020). It makes me feelvulnerable! The impact of public self-disclosure on online complaint behavior.International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102512.

Evans, Y., Selkie, E., Midamba, N., Ton, A., and Moreno, M. (2016). Proposed solutions for addressing cyberbullying: a qualitative study of adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 58:S73.

Gao, L., Liu, J., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Wang, X. (2020). Moral disengagement and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Student-student relationship and gender as moderators. Children and Youth Services Review.

Helfrich, E. L., Doty, J. L., Su, Y. W., Yourell, J. L., & Gabrielli, J. (2020). Parental views on preventing and minimizing negative effects of cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105377.

Huang, C. L., Alimu, Y., Yang, S. C., & Kang, S. (2023). What you think is a joke is actually cyberbullying: The effects of ethical dissonance, event judgment and humor style on cyberbullying behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107670.

Jiping, Y., Shuang, L., Ling, G., & XingChao, W. (2022). Longitudinal Associations among Peer Pressure, Moral Disengangement and Cyberbullying Perpetration in Adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior.

Jun, W. (2020, June 28). A Study on the Cause Analysis of Cyberbullying in Korean Adolescents. NCBI. Kamel, A. A. K., Abdul Hussein, A. T., Shekban, A. H., Badr, D. N. R., Mezan, S. O., & Jabir,W. Q. (2021,

April 16). Improvement Of A New Analysis Technique Of Phenomenon Of Bulling And Cyberbullying Among Students At Different Stages. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education,12(7), 3106-3115.

Kao, K. (2021, March 30). Social media addiction linked to cyberbullying. UGA Today. Retrieved June 27, 2023, from https://news.uga.edu/social-media-addiction-linked-to-cyberbullying/

Kavuk Kalender, M., Keser, H., & Tugun, V. (2019). Middle and high school students' opinions, experiences and responses regarding to cyberbullying. Education and Science, 44(198), 183-200.

Kechter A, Black DS, Riggs NR, Warren CM, Ritt-Olson A, Chou CP, Pentz MA (2019). Factors in the perceived stress scale differentially associate with mindfulness disposition and executive function among early adolescents. J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Mar;28(3):814-821

Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32.

Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2012). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 434–443.

Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Siponen, M. (2016). Why Do Adults Engage in Cyberbullying on Social Media? An Integration of Online Disinhibition and Deindividuation Effects with the Social Structure and Social Learning Model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986.

Maurya, C., Muhammad, T., Dhillon, P., & Maurya, P. (2022). The effects of cyberbullying victimization on depression and suicidal ideation among adolescents and young adults: a three year cohort study from India. BMC psychiatry, 22(1), 1-14.

Manerikar, V., & Manerikar, S. (2015). Cronbach alpha. Aweshkar Research Journal, 14(1), 117-119.

Ministry of Economy. (2023, August). Pocket Stats Q2 2023. Department of Statistics Malaysia. https://cloud.stats.gov.my/index.php/s/nY6koOKpj2QwDDV#pdfviewer

Pomytkina, L., Podkopaieva, Y., & Hordiienko, K. (2021, December 8). Peculiarities of Manifestation of Student Youth' Roles and Positions in the Cyberbullying Process. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 6, 1-10.

Rong, Z., & Fang, Y. (2018). A study on the problem of peer pressure among college students in the perspective of ideological and political education. Cotemporary Tourism.

Ronis, S., & Slaunwhite, A. (2019). Gender and Geographic Predictors of Cyberbullying Victimization, Perpetration, and Coping Modalities Among Youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 34(1), 3–21.

Saif, A. N. M., & Purbasha, A. E. (2023). Cyberbullying among youth in developing countries: A qualitative systematic review with bibliometric analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 106831.

Salkind, N. J. (2017). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. 6 Edition. Los Angeles, SAGE Publications, Inc.

Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Colman, I., Goldfield, G.S. et al. Combinations of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration and their associations with depressive symptoms and other mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17, 72 (2020).

Santre, S. (2022). Cyberbullying in adolescents: A literature review. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 35(1), 1-7.

Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2017). The role of parental mediation and peer norms on the likelihood of cyberbullying. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 178(1), 15–27.

Shaikh, F. B., Rehman, M., & Amin, A. (2020). Cyberbullying: A systematic literature review to identify the factors impelling university students towards cyberbullying. IEEE Access, 8, 148031-148051.

Tanrikulu, I. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs in schools: A systematic review. School Psychology International, 39(1), 74–91.

Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., & Scott, J. G. (2015). Integrating traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Challenges of definition and measurement in adolescents–a review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 135-152.

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following You Home from School: A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research on Cyberbullying Victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277-287.

Vyas, M., & Gupta, D. (2020). Peer Pressure among Teenagers. IRE Journals, 3(10), 159.

Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: a comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Frontiers in public health, 9, 634909.

Wagenknecht, T., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2018). A Janus-faced matter—The role of user anonymity for communication persuasiveness in online discussions. Information & Management, 55(8), 1024–1037.

Zulkifli, A. A. N. (2022, December). International Journal Of Law, Government And Communication (Ijkgc).

Cyberbullying In Malaysia: An Analysis Of The Existing Laws.

Zych I, Ortega-Ruiz R, Del Rey R. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggress Violent Behav. 23:1–21

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31