Examining the Effects of Environmental Concern, Attitude, and Perceived Behavioral Control on Generation Z’s Purchase Intention for Recycled Fashion Products

Authors

  • Aziza Safira Farhan Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Andalas
  • Ratni Prima Lita Universitas Andalas
  • Maruf Maruf Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37301/jmubh.v21i2.30001

Abstract

The fashion industry significantly contributes to environmental degradation, particularly through textile waste and carbon emissions. Recycled fashion products have emerged as an alternative to promote sustainable consumption. Although Generation Z is recognized for having a high level of environmental concern, the dynamics underlying the formation of purchase intention toward recycled fashion products require deeper understanding. This study aims to examine the effects of environmental concern, attitude, and perceived behavioral control on Generation Z’s purchase intention toward recycled fashion products. This research adopts a quantitative approach using a survey method involving 115 Generation Z respondents who are familiar with recycled fashion products. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 4.0. The findings indicate that environmental concern, attitude, and perceived behavioral control have positive and significant effects on purchase intention. These results reinforce the applicability of the Theory of Planned Behavior in explaining purchase intention within the sustainable fashion context and highlight the importance of psychological factors and perceived behavioral control in shaping Generation Z’s purchasing decisions.

References

Abdillah, W., & Hartono, J. (2015). PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS) : Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis (D. Prabantini (ed.); Edisi 1). Penerbit Andi.

Advanced Analytics Asia. (2023). Menangani dan Mengurangi Limbah Industri Fashion. https://lab.id/limbah-industri-fashion/

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Alya Audina, G., Rubiyanti, N., Widodo, A., Silvianita, A., & Audina, G. A. (2024). Green Purchase Intention in Slow Fashion: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research (IJSMR), 2(6), 559. https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/ijsmr

Cayaban, C. J. G., Prasetyo, Y. T., Persada, S. F., Borres, R. D., Gumasing, M. J. J., & Nadlifatin, R. (2023). The Influence of Social Media and Sustainability Advocacy on the Purchase Intention of Filipino Consumers in Fast Fashion. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(11), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118502

Chaturvedi, P., Kulshreshtha, K., & Tripathi, V. (2020). Investigating the determinants of behavioral intentions of generation Z for recycled clothing: an evidence from a developing economy. Young Consumers, 21(4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2020-1110

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision, 50(3), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211216250

Dangelico, R. M., Alvino, L., & Fraccascia, L. (2022). Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185(October), 122010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122010

Deepika, K. S., & Massand, A. (2025). A study on reflective factors of social media marketing activities and its influence on purchase intention of gen z. Acta Psychologica, 259(105459). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105459

Dobbelstein, T., & Lochner, C. (2023). Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2256–2277. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2504

Good Stats. (2023). Sampah Pakaian Makin Banyak, Saatnya Sudahi Konsumsi Fast Fashion. Good Stats. https://goodstats.id/article/sampah-pakaian-makin-banyak-saatnya-sudahi-konsumsi-fast-fashion-Bx10s

Good Stats. (2024). Simak Pilihan Fashion Anak Muda Indonesia 2024. Good Stats. https://goodstats.id/article/simak-pilihan-fahion-anak-muda-indonesia-uvo3N

Good Stats. (2025). Zero Waste Movement Jadi Lifestyle Favorit Gen Z. https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/zero-waste-movement-jadi-lifestyle-favorit-gen-z-uaLRs

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equa- tion Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Ifthiharfi, R., Dewanti, Y., & Halida, R. (2025). Buy or Bye? Youth Recycling Fashion from Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 12(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v12i1.44565

Jalil, M. H., & Shaharuddin, S. S. (2019). Consumer purchase behavior of eco-fashion clothes as a trend to reduce clothing waste. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(12), 4224–4233. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L2693.1081219

Jin, X., Omar, A., & Fu, K. (2024). Factors Influencing Purchase Intention toward Recycled Apparel: Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093633

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (2024). Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional. https://sipsn.kemenlh.go.id/sipsn/

Kim, I., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021). Consumers’ value and risk perceptions of circular fashion: Comparison between secondhand, upcycled, and recycled clothing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031208

Li, G., Yang, L., Zhang, B., Li, X., & Chen, F. (2021). How do environmental values impact green product purchase intention? The moderating role of green trust. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(33), 46020–46034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13946-y

Managed, W. (2025). Fashion Waste – 2025 Facts & Statistics. https://www.wastemanaged.co.uk/our-news/retail/fashion-waste-facts-and-statistics/

Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x

Reynaldi, M., Lita, R. P., & Maruf. (2023). Pengaruh The Theory of Planned Behavior terhadap Minat Beralih Menggunakan Kemasan Ramah Lingkungan. Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 5, 573–580. https://doi.org/10.37034/infeb.v5i2.577

Rossanty, Y., & Nasution, M. D. T. P. (2025). Eco-Friendly Fashion and Personal Values: Revealing the Hidden Forces behind Attitudes and Purchase Intentions. International Review of Management and Marketing , 15(2), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17900

Samaniego-Arias, M., Chávez-Rojas, E., García-Umaña, A., Carrión-Bósquez, N., Ortiz-Regalado, O., Llamo-Burga, M., Ruiz-García, W., Guerrero-Haro, S., & Cando-Aguinaga, W. (2025). The Impact of Social Media on the Purchase Intention of Organic Products. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062706

Schiaroli, V., Dangelico, R. M., & Fraccascia, L. (2025). Consumer behavioral intention for sustainable garments: do materials used and the level of garment’s visibility and skin contact matter? Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 10(5), 100764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100764

Şener, T., Bişkin, F., & Dündar, N. (2023). The effects of perceived value, environmental concern and attitude on recycled fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(4), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2021-0003

Sofya, A., Novita, N. C., Afgani, M. W., Isnaini, M., Islam, U., Raden, N., & Palembang, F. (2024). Metode Survey : Explanatory Survey dan Cross Sectional dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif Survey Methods : Explanatory Survey and Cross Sectional in Quantitative Research. 4(3), 1695–1708.

Sun, H., Teh, P. L., & Linton, J. D. (2018). Impact of environmental knowledge and product quality on student attitude toward products with recycled/remanufactured content: Implications for environmental education and green manufacturing. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2043

Sun, Y., & Wang, S. (2020). Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(4), 860–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0178

Sun, Y., & Xing, J. (2022). The Impact of Social Media Information Sharing on the Green Purchase Intention among Generation Z. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116879

Teng, C. C., & Wang, Y. M. (2015). Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions. British Food Journal, 117(3), 1066–1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2013-0361

Thongpila, kamolchanok. (2019). Applying the Theory of Planned Bahavior to Influence Purchase Intention of Green Fashion Made from Recycled Plastic in Thailand. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, 1–68.

Tusholihah, A., & Nora, L. (2025). Consumer’s Purchase Intention Towards Sustainable Fashion Products: Effect of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Attitude. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 11(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.11.1.56

Wong, S. L., Hsu, C. C., & Chen, H. S. (2018). To buy or not to buy? Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions for suboptimal food. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071431

Wu, Y., & Lee, Y. S. (2025). A Study on the Impact of the Consumption Value of Sustainable Fashion Products on Purchase Intention Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(10), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104278

Yadav, S. S., Kar, S. K., & Rai, P. K. (2022). Why do consumers buy recycled shoes? An amalgamation of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10(October), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1007959

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31